Legal Opinion

Sandoval v. Sandoval

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1996No. S-6602PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice, Pro Tern.

I. INTRODUCTION

This appeal presents the question whether Robert Sandoval’s Rule 60(b) Motion to Set Aside Judgment should have been granted. The trial court found that his motion was untimely filed. We affirm.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Lois Sandoval and Robert Sandoval were married from 1972 to 1981, for about half of 1984, and from 1985 until 1993. Lois filed for divorce in April 1991. They have five children, one adult and four minors. One child, a daughter, is Lois’s natural child and Robert’s adopted child.

In August 1991, Robert was ordered to pay child…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bauman v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Gregor v. HodgesAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. McCracken v. DavisAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. Alaska Continental Development Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Cleary Diving Service, Inc. v. Thomas, Head & GreisenAlaska Supreme Court · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Powell v. PowellAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Erica G. v. Taylor Taxi, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Rowland v. MonsenAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Schaub v. SchaubAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Song v. SongAlaska Supreme Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API