Song v. Song
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION. BRYNER, Justice.,
Shortly after Kyong Taek Song (Mr. Song) and Hyun Joo Song (Ms. Song) obtained a decree of dissolution, Mr. Song moved to enforce the stipulated property settlement incorporated in the decree. Ms. Song, alleging fraud, responded by moving for relief under Alaska Civil Rule 60(b). After a brief hearing, the court granted Ms. Song’s motion for Rule 60(b) relief and issued an amended divorce decree modifying the original property agreement. Mr. Song appeals, arguing that the court erred in setting aside the dissolution decree, in entering a modified decree, and in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- O'Link v. O'LinkAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Hartland v. HartlandAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Lowe v. LoweAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Alaska Northern Development, Inc. v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Davis v. DykmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mahan v. MahanAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Harris v. WestfallAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Pruitt v. City of SewardAlaska Supreme Court · 2007