Legal Opinion

Schaub v. Schaub

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 2013No. 6803 S-14502PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A couple divorced in 1992. The divorce decree did not divide the parties' property. The man receives military retirement benefits from over 22 years of service in the United States military. In October 2010 the woman filed a motion seeking a post-decree equitable division of property. The man opposed, arguing that the woman's claim was barred by (1) the statute of limitations; (2) laches; and (8) estoppel. The superior court concluded that the woman could properly bring her motion, that her motion was not barred by the statute of limitations, and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Cox v. CoxAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Laing v. LaingAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Peterson v. EkAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Wolff v. Arctic Bowl, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kollander v. KollanderAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Dundas v. DundasAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Corkery v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API