People v. Rios
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAXTER, J.
—On retrial after a prior acquittal of murder, defendant was convicted of voluntary manslaughter for a homicide the jury found to be both unlawful (i.e., neither justified nor excused) and intentional. Defendant asserts, among other things, that the voluntary manslaughter instructions *454were prejudicially incomplete because they omitted the voluntary manslaughter “elements” that the killing must have occurred in a heat of passion upon sufficient provocation (hereafter heat of passion or provocation), or in the actual but unreasonable belief in the need for self-defense…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by124 opinions
- People v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. AvilaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. ValdezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. BeltranCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.