Legal Opinion

Twyman v. Johnson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 13, 1995No. 93-CV-1092, 93-CV-1441PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARRELL, Associate Judge:

On this appeal from a jury verdict that, among other things, awarded the plaintiff-appellant damages for retaliation under the Rental Housing Act of 1985 (the Act), the primary issues are whether the trial judge erred in directing a verdict against plaintiff on her claim for negligence and whether an independent cause of action for retaliation may be maintained under the Act. We answer both questions in the negative, and therefore affirm in part and reverse in part the judgment of the trial court.

I

Plaintiff Mary Twyman has been the tenant of defendant Naomi Johnson…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Suter v. Artist M.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Alabama Power Co. v. IckesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. WalkerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Tolu v. AyodejiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Osbourne v. Capital City Mortgage Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. 325-343 E. 56TH STREET CORP. v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1995
  5. Mixon v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API