Legal Opinion
FRC of Kamms Corner, Inc. v. Cleveland Board of Zoning Appeals
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 15, 1984No. 47110PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, P.J.
FRC of Kamms Corner, Inc., the appellant in the above-captioned case, is a small restaurant located in Cleveland, Ohio. In 1972, it placed a mobile, double-faced sign on the property in front of its building. Upon discovering that mobile signs were not allowed within the setback area of the property for longer than thirty days, it structurally reinforced the sign and embedded it in a large concrete pad. Although no permit was obtained from the city of Cleveland to utilize the reinforced sign, it remained on the property without challenge for nine years.
In 1982, the city of Cleveland notified…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dudukovich v. Lorain Metropolitan Housing AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- State ex rel. Sibarco Corp. v. City of BereaOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. City of Rocky RiverOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- Consolidated Management, Inc. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- SMC, Inc. v. LaudiOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Cleveland v. PosnerOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- City of Huber Heights v. LiakosOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- Peterson v. Washington Court Athletic ClubOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
- Roy v. Cleveland Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- City of Cleveland v. WattsCity of Cleveland Municipal Court · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.