Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Washington Court Athletic Club
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 9, 1986No. 1438PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaird, J.
This cause came on before the court upon appellant’s appeal from the judgment of the Medina County Court of Common Pleas affirming the grant of a variance by the Montville Township Board of Zoning Appeals in favor of the Washington Court Athletic Club (“Washington Court”). We affirm.
Washington Court applied for a variance from Montville Township Zoning Resolution Section 310, which prohibits the construction of a swimming pool in a front or side yard. Washington Court had no backyard due to the location of its building. Washington Court sought to build a pool in its side yard, adjacent to its…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kisil v. City of SanduskyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- C. Miller Chevrolet, Inc. v. City of Willoughby HillsOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- Consolidated Management, Inc. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- FRC of Kamms Corner, Inc. v. Cleveland Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gilmartin v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Zangara v. Chester Twp. TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- Zangara v. Chester Twp. TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- Zangara v. Chester Twp. TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 1991