Legal Opinion
City of Huber Heights v. Liakos
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided July 13, 2001No. C.A. Case No. 18547, T.C. Case No. 00 CV 03932PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Grady, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment and order of the court of common pleas finding an ordinance enacted by the city of Huber Heights to be unconstitutional.
The ordinance defines a “sexually-oriented business” (“SOB”) and requires a person who operates an SOB to obtain a license in order to engage in that business in Huber Heights. The license is issued by the City Manager of Huber Heights upon a written application. If the city manager finds probable cause to deny the license, the applicant may ask for a review of that decision by the city manager, a proceeding in which the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Deja Vu of Cincinnati, L.L.C. v. Union Township Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Blanchard Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. SimonOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- City of Cincinnati v. JenkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- Deja Vu Of Cincinnati, L.L.C. v. The Union Township Board Of TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Total Exposure. v. Miami Valley, Unpublished Decision (2-3-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.