Legal Opinion

Philadelphia v. Wyszynski

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1955No. Appeal, 253PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

The City of Philadelphia filed a complaint in equity against Roman Wyszynski and his wife to enjoin them from operating a commercial meat-smoking and processing plant on their property which is located in a district of the City zoned “A” Residential. It is not disputed that the pertinent zoning ordinance does not permit a commercial meat-processing plant in an “A” Residential district which is the most highly restricted classification designated by the zoning ordinance. Approximately forty-seven neighboring property owners were permitted to intervene as plaintiffs…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Herskovits Et Ux. v. IrwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Shapiro v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. A. J. Aberman, Inc. v. New KensingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Wyszynski v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Visual-Education Devices, Inc. v. Springettsbury TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. City of Sioux City v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  3. Schechter v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Upper Moreland Township v. MeadeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Shohola Township Board of Supervisors v. BishopSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API