Legal Opinion

Shohola Township Board of Supervisors v. Bishop

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 25, 1980No. 710 and 711PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

This appeal arises from an order sustaining preliminary objections to two complaints in equity. The complaints are substantially identical and were filed on April 13, 1978, by the Shohola Township Board of Supervisors and John and Gudrun Quinn, one against George and Madeline Bishop, the other against James and Florence White.

The allegations on the basis of which the Quinns seek relief may be summarized as follows. The Quinns are owners of a campsite in Shohola Falls Trails End, a subdivision that had been established for campsites; the Bishops and Whites are owners of other…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. SPIRES Et Ux. v. Hanover Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Hillbrook Apartments, Inc. v. Nyce Crete Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Honey Brook Township v. AlenovitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Derr Flooring Co. v. Whitemarsh Township Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Doylestown Township v. TeelingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Board of Supervisors of Liberty Township v. Charnita, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Adams County1984
  3. Doylestown Township v. TeelingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API