Legal Opinion
Wyszynski v. Philadelphia
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 27, 1952No. Appeal, 112PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,
The single question is whether or not the remedy against the enforcement of penalties for an alleged zoning violation provided by the Zoning Act of May 6, 1929 P. L. 1551, 53 PS 3822 et seq. is exclusive. The court below ruled that it was. This appeal followed.
Appellants aver, in their bill in equity to enjoin the enforcement of an order of a Bureau of Engineering, Surveys and Zoning, that appellants acquired title to real estate in a zoned area on January 5, 1945; that in February, 1947, they filed with the Bureau an application for a permit authorizing…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Taylor v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Schwab Adoption CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Herskovits Et Ux. v. IrwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Ventresca v. ExleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Thompson v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Knup v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Silverco, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising Co. v. ClairtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Ragano v. RigotCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Crudele v. CookDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.