Legal Opinion

Murzyn v. Amoco Corp.

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided May 16, 1995No. 2:94-cv-00188PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LOZANO, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by De fendants, Amoco Corporation and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, on March 17, 1995, the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiffs, Frank and Judy Murzyn, on March 17, 1995, and the Motion to Strike Jury Demand filed by Defendants on September 21, 1994. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; and, Defendants’ Motion to Strike Jury Demand is hereby rendered…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. FMC Corp. v. HollidaySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Leilani Exbom v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Health and Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. The Sunbeam-Oster Company, Inc. Group Benefits Plan for Salaried and Non-Bargaining Hourly Employees v. Leonard Whitehurst, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. Neurological Resources, P.C. v. Anthem InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1999
  3. Equity Fire & Casualty Co. v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  4. Bielenberg v. ODS Health Plan, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2010
  5. Engle v. Wal-Mart Associates Health & Welfare PlanDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API