Legal Opinion

People v. Collado

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 2008PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified to the extent of remitting this matter to Supreme Court for resentencing, and otherwise affirmed.

Because Supreme Court failed to pronounce the term of defendant’s mandatory postrelease supervision in his presence, this matter must be remitted to Supreme Court for a resentencing proceeding (see People v Sparber, 10 NY3d 457, 469-471 [2008]). We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments, concerning the propriety of his arrest, and conclude that they are meritless.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. SparberNew York Court of Appeals · 2008

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. AcevedoNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. People v. WarnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Nazario v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2009
  4. Mickens v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2009
  5. People v. ColladoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API