Legal Opinion
People v. Acevedo
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 30, 2011No. 129, 130PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Lippman.
The threshold, and we believe dispositive, issue on these appeals is whether a resentencing sought by a defendant to correct an illegally lenient sentence is effective to temporally resituate the sentence and thus alter the underlying conviction’s utility as a predicate for enhanced sentencing. This common issue arises from the following facts in each of the above-captioned matters.
People v Acevedo
In 2006, Mr. Acevedo was convicted of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and possession of a controlled substance in the third degree…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. SparberNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- Garner v. CORRECTIONAL SERVS.New York Court of Appeals · 2008
- People v. ColladoNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- People v. AcevedoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- People v. VelezNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
- People v. BoyerNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- People v. CovingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. PerezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. ManuelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.