Legal Opinion
Mildred Jerves v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 11, 1992No. 90-16749PublishedCited by 253 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Mildred Jerves appeals the dismissal of her action against the United States for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm.
I
On September 1, 1987, Mildred Jerves fell and broke her leg at the Pearl Harbor Naval Base Commissary. After her fall, she filed a $250,000 damages claim against the United States with the Naval Legal Service Office (NLSO), the appropriate federal agency. Less than five months later, on December 28, 1989, she commenced this action against the United States in district court. In a judgment entered on October 26, 1990, the district court…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ardestani v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Estelle E. Caton v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Meridian International Logistics, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Keith Yazzie Mann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by253 opinions
- McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Mader v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Clarissa Brady,plaintiff-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Anton Vacek, and Golden Eagle Insurance Company v. United States Postal Service United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- VALADEZ-LOPEZ v. ChertoffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
248 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.