Legal Opinion

Mader v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 7, 2011No. 09-1025PublishedCited by 349 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEAM, Circuit Judge,

with whom

RILEY, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN, LOKEN (except as to Part II), COLLOTON (except as to Part V), GRUENDER and BENTON, Circuit Judges, join.

In this appeal concerning the Federal Tort Claims Act, we determine whether a purported personal representative may invoke the adjudicatory capacity, that is, the subject-matter jurisdiction of a United States District Court on behalf of statutory beneficiaries if, under 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a), the representative fails or refuses to first present to the appropriate *797federal agency evidence of her authority to act on behalf of such…

2Cases cited101 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by349 opinions

  1. Cecelia Webb v. City of MaplewoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  2. Danzel Stearns v. Inmate Services CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  3. Addones Spencer v. Anthony HaynesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  4. Gary Reece v. Bank of New York MellonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  5. Anzaldua v. Northeast Ambulance & Fire Protection DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015

344 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API