Legal Opinion

VALADEZ-LOPEZ v. Chertoff

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 26, 2011No. 09-16375, 09-17479, 09-17481PublishedCited by 127 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMAS, Circuit Judge:

In this appeal, we consider whether the plaintiff properly exhausted his administrative remedies under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA” or the “Act”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346, 2671-80, see id. § 2675(a), where the federal agencies denied the plaintiffs administrative tort claims before he amended his complaint in an ongoing civil action to name the United States as a party and allege a new cause of action under the Act. We conclude that the claims were properly exhausted, but affirm the district court’s dismissal on the alternate ground that Valadez-Lopez stated FTCA…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by127 opinions

  1. Sergio Ramirez v. County of San BernardinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Smoke Shop, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  3. Lee Rice, II v. Dale MorehouseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  4. D.L. ex rel. Junio v. VassilevCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. Brian Iverson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020

122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API