Legal Opinion

Woodson v. Department of Social Services

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 1970No. Docket 6,605PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

The plaintiff, Daniel Woodson, is a blind man. For a number of years he has been receiving welfare benefits from the state under the Federally-assisted aid-to-blind program.

In August, 1967, shortly after he began receiving $79 a month as a social security disability payment, he was advised by the department of welfare that his monthly aid-to-the-blind check would be reduced by that amount, from $124 a month to $45 a month, effective October, 1967.

In September, 1967 Woodson sought and was granted the statutorily-required “fair hearing”. The hearing was held on November 9,1967, i.e., after the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Ewing v. Mytinger & Casselberry, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Opp Cotton Mills, Inc. v. Administrator of the Wage & Hour Division of the Department of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Naudzius v. LahrMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Dation v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Geneva Towers Tenants Organization v. Federated Mortgage InvestorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  2. Yee-Litt v. RichardsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1973
  3. Provost v. BetitDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1971
  4. Smolen v. Dahlmann Apartments, LtdMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Geneva Towers Tenants Organization, an Unincorporated Association v. Federated Mortgage Investors, and Geneva Apartments, Inc., Geneva Towers Tenants Organization, Etc. v. George W. Romney, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Geneva Towers Tenants Organization, an Unincorporated Association v. Federated Mortgage Investors, Nilda Keller v. George W. Romney, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, and James H. Price, Individually and in His Capacity as Director, San Francisco Area Office, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Nilda Keller v. Kate Maremont Foundation, Nilda Keller v. Kate Maremont FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API