Provost v. Betit
District Court, D. Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
LEDDY, District Judge.
The question presented here is whether the Vermont Department of Social Welfare can, in accordance with the mandates of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, effectuate state-wide policy changes in the Vermont Social Welfare program having the overall effect of increasing the benefits of some recipients and reducing that of others without first affording the latter a prereduction hearing.
From the evidence adduced, the facts are as follows:
Sometime between October and November 1, 1970, the Vermont Department of Social Welfare revised its Aid to Needy…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Greene v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Budnicki v. BealDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Opinion of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Turner Ex Rel. Turner v. WalshDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1977
- Yee-Litt v. RichardsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1973
- In Re DielSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.