State v. Sirek
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
Appellant Steven Sirek was convicted of murder in the second degree, Minn.Stat. § 609.19(2), and Minn.Stat. § 609.05 (1984). He contends a plea agreement entered into by his accomplice encouraged perjury and that the accomplice’s testimony was therefore inadmissible. He also claims the evidence was insufficient, the trial court’s decision was tainted by knowledge of appellant’s involvement in criminal activity because the court heard evidence at a Spreigl hearing, and that a double durational departure was not justified. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant’s conviction arose out…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. BillstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- United States v. Burton A. LibrachCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- State v. FilippiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- United States v. John Walter Waterman, A/K/A Jack WatermanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986