Legal Opinion

Dombrowski v. Roe-Stephens Manufacturing Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1914No. Docket No. 30PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hally, J. Case by Adam Dombrowski against the Roe-Stephens Manufacturing Company for personal injuries. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.

From a judgment entered on a directed verdict for the defendant, the plaintiff appeals. The plaintiff, 26 years of age, was a molder’s helper in the foundry department of defendant’s plant. While operating a circular ripsaw in the wood-working department, his left thumb and first and second fingers were severed at the knuckles. He had been employed about one year and nine months before the injury, and during the last nine months had frequently used the ripsaw, and occasionally during the first year. The plaintiff described the way in which the accident occurred as follows:

“I took a piece of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bauer v. American Car & Foundry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Berlin v. William B. Mershon & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Mushinski v. VincentMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Fryezynski v. W. W. Rice Leather Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fuller v. Wurzburg Dry Goods Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Guido v. Detroit Stove WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API