Caldwell v. Coppola
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NARES, J.
Rocco F. Coppola appeals the domestic violence injunctive order restraining him from harassing the applicant, Pamela L. Caldwell, and her sister, Kim Tucker. Coppola contends the order is void for lack of personal jurisdiction based on improper service. Coppola asserts service was improper because Tucker, a person protected by the court’s order, personally served him with the application and supporting declaration. Coppola suggests a person protected by a temporary restraining order (TRO) is a party to the proceeding and, as such, cannot validly effect personal service. We…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Slaughter v. Legal Process & Courier ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Sternbeck v. BuckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Sheehan v. All Persons, Etc.California Court of Appeal · 1926
- In Re Marriage of SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- In Re Marriage of Van HookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- O'KANE v. IrvineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Ruttenberg v. RuttenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- N.T. v. H.T., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.