Legal Opinion

Williams v. Ormsby

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 2012No. 2010-1946PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.

{¶ 1} We are asked to determine whether merely resuming a romantic relationship by moving into a home with another can serve as consideration for a contract. We hold that it cannot.

I. Factual Background

{¶ 2} This case arises in the context of a nonmarital relationship between Amber Williams, the appellee, and Frederick Ormsby, the appellant. In May 2004, Frederick moved into Amber’s house on Hardwood Hollow in Medina to which she had received title through her divorce settlement. Frederick began making the mortgage payments in August and paid the 2004 property taxes. He eventually paid the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kostelnik v. HelperOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Strock v. PressnellOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Perlmuter Printing Co. v. Strome, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1976
  4. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Bolles v. Toledo Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Brian Uszak v. AT&T Mobility ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  3. Martin v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Widok v. Estate of WolfOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Bruzzese v. Chesapeake Exploration, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API