Legal Opinion

Martin v. Tikka

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1972PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.

Plaintiffs brought this suit for specific performance of a contract whereby defendants were to purchase a fertilizer plant. Defendants affirmatively allege that they were induced to enter into the agreement to purchase by plaintiffs’ fraudulent misrepresentations.

Plaintiffs Martin are husband and wife and owners of all of the shares of plaintiff Portland Organic, Inc., an Oregon corporation. Portland Organic, located in north Portland on land leased from the city of Portland, manufactured fertilizer from sewage sludge from the cities of Portland and Lake Oswego. The sludge was stored, or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hansen v. HolmbergOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  2. J. C. Corbin Co. v. PrestonOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Caples v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Larsen v. LootensOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Oliphant v. FrenchOregon Supreme Court · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. North Pacific Lumber Co. v. OliverOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Delaney v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Gratreak v. North Pacific Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Kinyon v. CardonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Tikka v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API