Gratreak v. North Pacific Lumber Co.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
CAMPBELL, J.
1Opinion of the Court
*573CAMPBELL, J.
The plaintiff has appealed from the trial court’s order allowing the defendants’1 motion for summary judgment. We affirm.
The plaintiff’s complaint alleged that on February 18, 1974, the plaintiff was employed as a pole and piling salesman for defendant North Pacific. On April 8, 1976, plaintiff terminated his employment with North Pacific. Thereafter, plaintiff became employed by National Forest Products, Inc., as a salesman. On June 10, 1976, the defendants, without excuse or justification, wilfully and maliciously interfered with the contractual relations between plaintiff and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- North Pacific Lumber Co. v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- North Pacific Lumber Co. v. OliverOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Carey v. HaysOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Taylor v. GrantOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Dickerson v. MurfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rise v. SteckelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- McKinley v. WeidnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Thompson v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Pringle Square, LLC v. Berrey Family, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- Alcatec LLC and Rosemary Barbour v. The Jones Group of Mississippi LLC and Gennie Lacy JoneCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.