Legal Opinion
Curry v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 8, 2002No. 01-462CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
Pending in this military pay case are defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and plaintiff, Michael L. Curry’s motions to compel production and for summary judgment.1 The issues presented in this case are: when does a claim for back pay accrue, and when does the entitlement to pay expire for a serviceman confined because of a court-martial. For the reasons set out below, the plaintiffs motions are denied and the government’s motion is granted.
BACKGROUND2
Plaintiff, Michael L. Curry, entered the United States Marine Corps on a four year enlistment contract…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- The Japanese War Notes Association of the Philippines, Inc. (Japwancap, Inc.) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Jewell M. Hart v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- David E. Tippett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Barney v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- United States v. HammondArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
- Curry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003