Legal Opinion
Kuenzell v. United States
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 3, 1957No. Civ. 7293PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALBERT, District Judge.
This is an action against the United States of America to recover damages for the alleged wrongful entering upon plaintiffs’ lands and the alleged wrongful tak*98ing of plaintiffs’ timber. Jurisdiction has been conferred on this Court by Private Law 452, 84th Congress, 1st Session, Chapter 823, 69 U.S.Statutes at Large, A 154. Defendant has filed a motion for a more definite statement pursuant to Rule 12(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., and this motion has been submitted for decision at this time.
Preliminarily, certain general rules relating to the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Suckow Borax Mines Consolidated, Inc. v. Borax Consolidated, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Peterson v. GibbsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Independence Lead Mines Co. v. KingsburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Burlington Transp. Co. v. JosephsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
- Boerstler v. American Medical Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rusch Factors, Inc. v. LevinDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1968
- Federal Sav. and Loan Ins. Corp. v. MusacchioDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1988
- Great American Indemnity Company v. Johnnie BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Coon v. District Court in and for County of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
- Yaksich v. GastevichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.