Yaksich v. Gastevich
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Daniel Yaksich, Jr. brings this appeal contesting the trial court’s dismissal with prejudice of his pro se complaint for legal malpractice against Vladimir Gastevich, Sr. Gastevich filed a motion for more definite statement, and, when Yaksich failed to amend his complaint within 22 days, the trial court dismissed his action with prejudice. This appeal raises several issues including:
1) Did the trial court err in granting Gastevich’s motion for more definite statement?
2) Was the dismissal procedurally incorrect?
3) Should the dismissal be set aside for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Shideler v. DwyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. RankinIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- Rumfelt v. HimesIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
- Van Dyke Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1975
- Field v. AREA PLAN COM'N OF GRANT CTY., IND.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wilson v. PalmerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Graham v. SchreiferIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- McDillon v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Rueth Development Co. v. MuenichIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Jackson v. RussellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.