Legal Opinion
Susan Garfinkle and Gary Garfinkle v. Wells Fargo Bank
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 24, 1973No. 71-2323PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before TRASK and CHOY, Circuit Judges and TAYLOR, * District Judge.
FRED M. TAYLOR, District Judge.
Plaintiffs-Appellants, Susan and Gary Garfinkle, have appealed from an order of the District Court dismissing their action against the Wells Fargo Bank (Bank) for want of subject matter jurisdiction. The complaint alleges that the California extra-judicial foreclosure procedure violates the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution because it does not provide property owners with a meaningful opportunity to be heard before they lose substantial rights and interests.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Zwickler v. KootaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Esperanza Corral v. Select Portfolio ServicingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Mireles v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Chapman v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Garfinkle v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Janos Farkas v. GMAC Mortgage, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.