Legal Opinion

Horse Shoe Mining Co. v. Red Rose Lead & Zinc Mining Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 22, 1924No. 13416PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ESTES, C-

Plaintiff in error, Horse Shoe Mining Company, a corporation, herein referred to as intervener, was the owner of a mining leasehold estate in 20 acres of real estate in Ottawa county, on which there were no improvements. Its lease was duly recorded in 1917. Thereafter, in the same 5'ear, intervener entered into a contract with J. ,B. Rives and W. B, Atkins and assigns, providing for sale and conveyance to them of all its interest in such real estate, a mining lease being attached to such agreement, for $32,000 — $10,000 in cash, $1,000 within 30 days, and the balance to be…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strange v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Kingfisher Mill & Elev. Co. v. WestbrookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Romans v. ShannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Mann v. BradySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Mansur-Tebbetts Implement Co. v. WilletSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pirtle v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API