Legal Opinion

Mansur-Tebbetts Implement Co. v. Willet

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 30, 1900PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from the District Oourt of Kay Oounty• before Bay-ard T. Earner, District Jv,dge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Buewell, J.:

This is an action commenced in the district court of Kay county by the Mansur-Tebbetts Implement Company, a corporation, against George R. Wil-let, for the sum of $88.40, as liquidated damages, on account of the defendant’s refusal, to receive, pursuant to a certain contract, nine buggies, which the plaintiff had sold to him. The defendant answered setting up a set-off for $119.35. To this answer the plaintiff filed a general denial. The case proceeded to trial and when the plaintiff rested, the defendant, by leave of court, dismissed without prejudice his…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Harn v. ColeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Hinds v. Atlas Acceptance CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. J. I Case Plowworks v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Deming Inv. Co. v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Dunbar v. Commercial Electrical Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API