Legal Opinion
Romans v. Shannon
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 1, 1921No. 9805PublishedCited by 17 opinions
Error from District Court, Creek County; Ernest B. Hughes, Judge. Action by S. P. Romans against L. O. Shannon on contract. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtPitchford, J.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court of Creek county, in which judgment was rendered for the defendant. The cause was by an agreement tried to the court without jury.
The plaintiff contracted with the defendant 'to do certain work and labor in the construction of certain miles or road in Creek county. The material portion of the contract is as follows:
“First. The party of the second part agrees to move dirt for twenty (20c) per yard; loose rock for fifty cents (50c) per yard; solid rock for eighty (80c) per yard, and one and one-half cents for overhaul; twenty-five…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Strange v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Hunter v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Winemiller v. PageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Tidal Oil Co. v. RoelfsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Wlllmering v. McGaugheySupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cities Service Oil Co. v. Geolograph Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Cooke v. KinkeadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Delk v. City Nat. Bank of DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Rogers v. KinneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Dooley v. Hall CordesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.