Legal Opinion

Krawski v. Planning & Zoning Commission

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 4, 1990No. 7942PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.

The defendant commission appeals from the judgment of the trial court sustaining the plaintiffs appeal from the denial of his application for subdivision plan approval. The commission claims that the court erred in concluding that approval was unreasonably denied for reasons not based on subdivision regulations. We find error.

In April, 1987, the plaintiff sought the commission’s approval for a five lot subdivision on property at Felt Road and Ridgefield Drive in South Windsor. At the public hearing, the commission noted that the slope of at least one lot exceeded town zoning limits. One lot…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Reed v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Goldfeld v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  4. Moscowitz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  5. Ferndale Dairy, Inc. v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Baron v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  2. Azzarito v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  3. Gorman Construction Co. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  4. Lepage Homes, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  5. Lewis v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API