Goldfeld v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
This is an appeal1 from the judgment of the trial court sustaining the plaintiffs appeal from the decision of the defendant planning and zoning commission of the town of Greenwich.2 The plaintiff had applied to the commission to change the zone of certain property located in the town. The commission *174denied the application. The trial court, in sustaining the plaintiffs appeal, changed the zone of the property as requested in the plaintiff’s application. The defendants appeal. We find error.
The defendants argue that the trial court erred in finding that the plaintiff was aggrieved by the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Burnham v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Nader v. AltermattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Hall v. Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Goldberg v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Beckish v. ManafortSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Primerica v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- DiBonaventura v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Krawski v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Neumann v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Pollio v. Conservation CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.