State of Minnesota v. Roosevelt Hunter
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Judge.
We reverse the district court’s denial of appellant’s petition for postconviction relief because the state does not demonstrate that the district court’s erroneous jury instruction was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, and we remand for a new trial. But we affirm the district court’s denial of appellant’s motion to suppress evidence because police officers had reasonable, ar-ticulable suspicion to support the seizure of appellant’s vehicle.
FACTS
During an evening in March 2010, St. Paul police officers specializing in narcotics investigations were in a vehicle conducting…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. KuhnauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. MunsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. FloresSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. DickersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. Dominic Jason Allen SamCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Chaz Edwin JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Seneca Warrior SteeprockCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024