Town of Hayward v. Pimental
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Britt, C.
The respondent, the town of Hayward, in Alameda county, is a municipal corporation of the sixth class, and the appellant is the judge of the recorder’s court of said town. That court is provided for in section 882 of the Municipal Corporation Act of 1883. An ordinance of the town imposed a license tax upon persons engaged in certain classes of business. One Freeman carried on business within the purview of the ordinance and refused to pay the tax. Thereupon an action was commenced by the town of Hayward in said recorder’s court against said Freeman for the recovery of the amount of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Avery v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Schultze v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
- Aucker v. McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Hogue v. FanningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Hamilton v. TuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Star Motor Imports, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Matter of HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Gayle v. HammCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Associated Oil Co. v. MullinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.