Hogue v. Fanning
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
According to the stipulation of the parties, •the following appear to be the facts in this case: —
1. “That heretofore, to wit, on the first day of March, 1886, one J. N. Fanning commenced an action in the Justice’s Court of the fourth township, county of Fresno, *55state of California, against one Andrew Farley, for the recovery of the possession of a certain mare and colt, or for the sum of $275, the value thereof, in case a delivery could not be had; and for $50 damages for the detention thereof, with cost of suit.”
Said action was in the usual form of actions for claim and delivery of…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Flynn v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Aseltine v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1936
- Town of Hayward v. PimentalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Carvell v. WeaverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Lee Chu v. NoarHawaii Supreme Court · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.