Legal Opinion

City of Portland v. Kamm

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1882PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Multnomah County.

1Opinion of the Court

*384By the Court,

Watson, C. J.:

This was an appeal to the circuit court from an assessment of the damages and benefits occasioned by the extension of Salmon street through a tract of land belonging to the appellant, in the city of Portland. Prom the decision of the circuit court on such appeal, the cause has been appealed to this court. A question has been presented as to the meaning and constitutionality of sec. 7 of the act of December 19, 1865, entitled “An act to authorize the city of Portland to open, lay out and widen streets and alleys, and to appropriate private property therefor,” which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chandler v. Jamaica Pond Aqueduct Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  2. Fellowes v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Blagen v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Seattle & Montana Railway Co. v. GilchristWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Boyd v. GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Hall v. City of HillsboroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  5. Orth v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API