Legal Opinion

Seattle & Montana Railway Co. v. Gilchrist

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1892No. 349PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from, Superior Court Snohomish County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, C. J. —

This was a statutory proceeding instituted by appellant to appropriate a strip of land 100 feet in width across the premises of the respondents for the purpose of a right-of-way for its railroad. The right-of-way sought to be appropriated passes diagonally over the eastern portion of respondents’ land, separating it into two unequal parts, and cutting off about eleven acres to the east of the right-of-way from the larger tract lying to the west, and contains something less than two acres. The land of respondents is nearly all improved,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Washburn v. Milwaukee & Lake Winnebago RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Watson v. Milwaukee & Madison Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Hunt v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  4. Swan v. County of MiddlesexMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  5. Sawyer v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. WinebergWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Lewisburg & N. R. v. HindsTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Gurdon & Fort Smith Railroad v. VaughtSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  4. Sullivan v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  5. Valley Land Office, Inc. v. O'GRADYWashington Supreme Court · 1967

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API