Legal Opinion

Hall v. City of Hillsboro

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 11, 1977No. 34-386, CA 6285PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This is an appeal from the dismissal of a complaint filed under the Oregon tort claims act, ORS 30.260 to 30.300, against the city of Hillsboro. Plaintiffs, owners of residential property, allege that they purchased their property relying upon defendant’s representation that the abutting street would be developed as a city street, that defendant’s intentional and negligent failure to enforce city ordinances resulted in the developer constructing a substandard street, and that they were damaged in the amount of $38,627.90.

The court heard the matter as a motion for summary judgment upon the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States National Bank of Oregon v. DaviesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Colby v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  3. King v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1865
  4. City of Portland v. KammOregon Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Adams v. Oregon State PoliceOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Adams v. Oregon State PoliceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API