Hummel v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtHoyle, P. J.
Pat Hummel and Roy Hyatt were jointly charged and tried in the county court of Cherokee county of the crime of malicious mischief. The jury returned a five juror verdict finding them guilty, but failed to agree upon the punishment. A new trial having been denied, they by the judgment of the court were each sentenced to pay a fine of f 50.
To reverse the judgment they appeal.
The errors assigned are substantially as follows: The verdict is not sustained by and is contrary to the evidence and the law applicable thereto, and the court erred in overruling the demurrer to* the evidence, and in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lawton v. . SteeleNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- The City of Phoenix v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- Harvey v. DewoodySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1856
- Colbert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- State v. MinorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rea v. Motors Ins. CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
- State v. HollandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Holleman v. City of TulsaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
- GOODWIN v. BLAKECourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017