Legal Opinion

The City of Phoenix v. Johnson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1938No. Civil No. 3889PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

This is an appeal by the City of Phoenix, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called defendant, from a judgment in favor of Will Johnson and Hortense Johnson, his wife, hereinafter called plaintiffs. The record presents the following situation :

Plaintiffs brought'suit alleging, in substance, that they were the owners of and residents upon certain premises to the southwest of the City of Phoenix, and that defendant had built and installed a certain sewer system for said city which conveyed all of the sewage of the city to a sewage disposal plant within some 2,000 feet of plaintiffs’ property;…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Missouri v. Illinois & the Sanitary DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Hunter v. HunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Attorney General ex rel. Township of Wyoming v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Fifth Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Donahue v. Stockton Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Armory Park Neighborhood Ass'n v. Episcopal Community ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Ryan v. City of EmmetsburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  3. City of Scottsdale v. Municipal Court of TempeArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Maier v. City of KetchikanAlaska Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Taylor v. Roosevelt Irr. Dist.Arizona Supreme Court · 1951

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API