Legal Opinion
State v. Holland
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 15, 1975PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
132 N.J. Super. 17 (1975)
331 A.2d 626
STATE OF NEW JERSEY (VILLAGE OF SOUTH ORANGE), PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
WILLIAM HOLLAND, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted September 19, 1974.
Decided January 15, 1975.
Before Judges HALPERN, CRAHAY and ACKERMAN.
Messrs. Fox, Schackner, Neagle, Mastrangelo & Gassert, attorneys for appellant (Mr. Harlan E. Schackner on the brief).
No appearance on behalf of respondent.
2Per curiam
The defendant was found guilty after trial in the Municipal Court of South Orange of the charge that, in violation of Article 4, Section 15-25(b) of the…
3Cases cited39 opinions
- State v. ProfaciSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- City of Newark v. PulvermanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- State v. KluberNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- State v. SimsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by19 opinions
- New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. Alloway Township and County of Salem and William R. CobbNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
- Eanes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Gallenthin Realty Development, Inc. v. Borough of PaulsboroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- State v. Clarksburg InnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- In re LaBerge NOVSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.