Holleman v. City of Tulsa
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtBarefoot, P. J.
Defendant, Wilbur J. Holleman, was charged in the municipal criminal court of the city of Tulsa with the crime of malicious mischief; was tried be fore tlie court without the intervention of a jury; was convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of $18 and $2 costs. From such judgment and sentence he has appealed to this court.
The ordinance under which defendant was charged is as follows:
“Malicious mischief is hereby defined as an injury or destruction done to the property of another person and prompted by malice or hatred toward another or an injury or destruction done to the property of another…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Clasby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1943
- Commonwealth v. ByardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Willis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
- Werner v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
- Hummel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Patrick L. HeathershawCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Fitzgerald v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1955
- GOODWIN v. BLAKECourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017
- United States v. Patrick HeathershawCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996