Legal Opinion

Wilkening v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1959No. 34949PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, C. J.

The trial court granted an involuntary nonsuit at the close of plaintiff’s case. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing his action with prejudice.

Plaintiff originally owned a tract of land, the southeasterly portion of which was a natural embankment sloping down to and including the adjacent tide lands in the Des-Chutes waterway in the city of Olympia. A portion of plaintiff’s property below the embankment was subject to a thirty-foot railroad right of way traversed by a wooden trestle supporting a single railroad track. Plaintiff’s home is at the top of the embankment.

In 1947, the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cass v. DicksWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Smith v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Wood v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Traverso v. PupoWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Harvey v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Higday v. NickolausMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. King County v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Borden v. City of OlympiaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. Borden v. City of OlympiaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. Ball v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API