Legal Opinion

Borden v. City of Olympia

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 13, 2002No. 27029-3-IIPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

— Henry and Loretta Borden sued the City of Olympia because their property flooded. They alleged inverse condemnation, trespass, nuisance, negligence, and waste under RCW 4.24.630. The trial court granted summary judgment to the City. Taking the facts and inferences in the light most favorable to the Bordens,1 we reverse in part and affirm in part.

In 1980, the Bordens bought four acres, the east half of which was improved with a house and detached shop. They have lived in the house ever since.

In 1991, the Bordens short platted their four acres by drawing a north-south line from approximately…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Kitsap County v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Kitsap County v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Life Designs Ranch, Inc. v. Michael SommerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. Woods View II, LLC v. Kitsap CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. Borden v. City of OlympiaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. Pruitt v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. Pruitt v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API