Legal Opinion

Karl R. Smith, James W. Reed and Joseph Wachter v. Pittsburgh Gage and Supply Company, a Pennsylvania Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 26, 1968No. 16792PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.

Appellants, Karl R. Smith, James W. Reed and Joseph Wachter, appeal from the dismissal of their complaint against Pittsburgh Gage and Supply Company, appellee, in the Court below. In their complaint plaintiffs seek redress against their former employer under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (LMRA), as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. § 185. This litigation has had a history which dates from 1961 when these plaintiffs filed charges with the National Labor Relations Board. After the refusal of the Regional Director of the Board to issue…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Pittsburgh Gage & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Smith v. Pittsburgh Gage & Supply Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Smith v. Pittsburgh Gage & Supply Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Smith v. Pittsburgh Gage & Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Karl R. Smith v. Pittsburgh Gage and Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  2. Bryan W. Nickerson, Jr. v. Josef Kutschera, A. G. Birkenruth, the Tidewater Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
  3. Hall v. Mangoni (In Re Four Corners Enterprises, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1982
  4. Smith v. Pittsburgh Gage & Supply Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API