Legal Opinion
Smith v. Pittsburgh Gage & Supply Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 9, 1963No. Appeal, No. 86PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Benjamin B. Jones,
On this appeal the issue is narrow; whether a state court has jurisdiction to entertain this action of trespass wherein discharged employees, alleging that they were discharged from their employment by reason of a conspiracy between their union and employer, seek of the union and the employer reinstatement to employment and pecuniary damages.
*173Karl Smith, James Reed, Joseph Wachtre and Ed Owens (Employees), instituted a trespass action, in the nature of a trespass on the case for conspiracy, in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County against…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Smith v. Evening News Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Karl R. Smith v. Pittsburgh Gage and Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Altemose Construction Co. v. Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- City Line Open Hearth, Inc. v. Hotel, Motel & Club Employees' UnionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Smith v. Pittsburgh Gage & Supply Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
- Cosmark v. Struthers Wells Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.