Legal Opinion
Smith v. Pittsburgh Gage & Supply Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 16, 1965No. Civ. A. No. 65-067PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSENBERG, District Judge.
Several motions are here for determination. The first is a Motion to Dismiss as made by one defendant, Pittsburgh Gage and Supply Company. The second is a Motion Raising Questions of Lack of Jurisdiction over Subject Matter, and with it, a Motion for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted, as made by the second defendant, Steamfitters Local Union No. 449.
In the complaint separate counts are set forth for each plaintiff alleging that the defendants entered into a conspiracy to violate their collective bargaining agreement and deny them their…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Smith v. Evening News Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Charles Dowd Box Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Karl R. Smith v. Pittsburgh Gage and Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Rae v. United Parcel Service of Pa.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Chasis v. Progress Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
- Karl R. Smith, James W. Reed and Joseph Wachter v. Pittsburgh Gage and Supply Company, a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Smith v. Pittsburgh Gage & Supply Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.