Legal Opinion
Smith v. Pittsburgh Gage & Supply Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 23, 1967No. Civ. A. No. 66-1380PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSENBERG, District Judge.
This matter is here on a motion by the defendant Pittsburgh Gage & Supply Company to dismiss the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b).
The complaint alleges jurisdiction by reason of § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, as amended (61 Stat. 156, 29 U.S.C.A. § 185). It is further averred that at all times material to the complaint, the plaintiffs were employees of the defendant and members of Steamfitters Local Union No. 449; that each of the plaintiffs was laid off in January, 1961; that they were informed the lay-off was due to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Smith v. Evening News Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Karl R. Smith v. Pittsburgh Gage and Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Hall v. Mangoni (In Re Four Corners Enterprises, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1982
- Karl R. Smith, James W. Reed and Joseph Wachter v. Pittsburgh Gage and Supply Company, a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Smith v. Pittsburgh Gage & Supply Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1971